1963 ford thunderbird 'm code' sports roadster

1963 ford thunderbird 'm code' sports roadster code#

This “tri-power” setup was completed with a special intake manifold feeding Ford 406 heads on top of the Thunderbird 390 V8 block, resulting in an incredible 340hp.

1963 ford thunderbird 'm code' sports roadster code#

Displaying the engine code M in the chassis number, the M-code cars utilized three two barrel carburetors. While the new Thunderbird and Thunderbird Sports Roadster were up to par on style, Ford was still looking to dial in more performance. This striking addition transformed the four seat arrangement into a sporty two seater that called back to the first generation of T-birds introduced in 1955. However the pinnacle difference was the removable tonneau cover that sealed off the back seat and would not limit the use of the power convertible top when in place. The Sports Roadster was accented by special badging, a color matched passenger dash grab handle, and Kelsey-Hayes chrome wire wheels with “knock off” style hubcaps. The pinnacle of the third generation Thunderbird was the Sports Roadster package introduced in 1962 and only offered through the 1963 model year. Kennedy used 50 examples of Ford’s new entry level luxury model in his inaugural parade. The new sleek, aerodynamic design was influenced by the fighter jets of the era and gave the thunderbird a ready for takeoff appearance that some found inspiring. Allow me to offer up a sincere 'welcome aboard' here and now - give it another shot, and I'm sure you'll agree with all my above statements.Ford Motor Company introduced the third generation Thunderbird in 1961. I hope this little misunderstanding won't sour your impression of this site. Whether it be as a reference center for info or for great, helpful folks when it comes to these awesome cars, or just as a place to 'hang out' and make some great friends of fellow T-Birders. Murf, bottom line is that this is an amazing place. Hopefully this feature makes sense now as a quick reference for info that might be needed by different members in an easy-to-access format, eliminating the need for a 'search'.Īllow me to offer the suggestion, however, that particularly as a newcomer here, a simple explanation of your intentions in the initial post would have been sufficient without the added insults of long-term members' writing/grammar/whatever skills. I must say I'm a bit surprised that someone who states they utilize hundreds of websites on a regular basis has never seen a 'sticky' before, as I've been a member of several dozen myself over the years, and couldn't think one that doesn't - but that's neither here nor there. My follow-up to Brian's response was also meant in this same vein.and I will also honestly add that I, too, interpreted your post as, well, 'grumpy' myself, for lack of a better term - especially by a 'newbie' member - so no doubt the playful sarcasm ran somewhat rampant between the two of us. I can honestly say I've never seen anyone here intentionally offend another member. These cars can be a frustrating handful at times, and this is one innocently-intended way of blowing off steam, along with being just plain old camaraderie amongst fellow 'Birders'.

While this may occasionally catch some off-guard, I can just about guarantee you that nothing malicious is ever intended. That said, the folks here are a fun bunch whose level of intelligence and sense of humour is on display on a pretty regular basis. Let me start this by saying that the reason I got involved with this website is the unbelievable level of civility, respect, and helpfulness of the members here - especially in comparison to other automotive-type sites. It looks like we all got off on the wrong foot here. Your response was informative, but TRULY UNPLEASANT. Instead, please try mastering America's version of English vice arrogance so you can differentiate between a statement and a question. And if that is diplomacy, please do not ever work in a field requiring such. It didn't need diplomacy, just an answer. If it is administrative, why doesn't the web site so designate, so the those of us unfamiliar with this PARTICULAR site's jargon and/or procedures are informed vice being subjected to your erroneous assumptions and pompous demeanor? There is NO glossary on this web site (that I have found) that explains such or I'd not have asked.Īs for your 'supporter' - diplomatic? Not even close. I have NEVER seen a web site with this symbol and between my personal inquiries and our international business, we see hundreds. Whereas your response sentence was informative, answering what I asked, the base of your message is arrogant. It was ended with a question mark, not a period or exclamation mark. I asked 2 questions, combined in 1 sentence.

Boy that was an unpleasant surprise 'Brian'.